Three asylum cases received grant from immigration court judges

We have had three grants in the past 5 days.

Case No. 1.  Client was referred to immigration court from the New York asylum office about two years ago.  We took the case and filed a motion to change venue from NYC to San Francisco; then we filed a motion to advance the hearing for almost 2 years.  Then Steve appeared in court last week.  Steve corrected several major interpreter mistakes to make sure that the true meanings of our client's testimony were accurately reflected in the record.  The judge granted the case in less than 90 minutes.

Case No. 2. Client was detained at El Paso after he fell from a border wall in 2020.  We visited him in El Paso 3 times before he was released on bond.  His hearing lasted for more than 8 hours in 3 separate sessions because the government lawyer kept asking many questions about his CCP past.

Eventually the judge granted his asylum application.

Case No. 3  client had an abortion in China.  She prepared her asylum application with the help of an immigration consultant/interpreter.  The case was referred to immigration court when because asylum office claimed that there were inconsistencies.  We were retained in court.  Today, in less than 40 minutes we received a grant from the judge.  We focused on key elements of the case and we showed that our client is credible.

Since 2019 when we started to record our immigration court cases, we had only one denial due to the one year issue (The case was filed by another lawyer who clearly had committed malpractice by not filing the case immediately when he was retained).  Other than that, we have a 100% success record.

If you want to have a fair shot at your asylum case, especially if your case is in immigration court, you should consult with experienced and devoted lawyers.